Home

Results 1 - 10 of 154,888 for rounded. Search took 0.383 seconds.  
Sort by date/Sort by relevance
The Third Round provided an opportunity to probe the reasons for discrepancies in the Second Round rankings; vii. (...) More specifically, sec. 5.9.1 of the Promotions Policy provides the following in respect of the Second Round: 5.9.1 A comparative assessment of the staff members who advanced from the First Round will be undertaken in the Second Round evaluation of the promotions procedure. (...) All candidates who had passed the First Round were required to be assessed on their merits as one group in the Second Round to produce a list of “substantially equally meritorious” candidates for consideration by the SPP in the Third Round. 62.
Language:English
Score: 618251.3 - www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2016-043.pdf
Data Source: oaj
The Third Round provided an opportunity to probe the reasons for discrepancies in the Second Round rankings; Case No. (...) More specifically, sec. 5.9.1 of the Promotions Policy provides the following in respect of the Second Round: 5.9.1 A comparative assessment of the staff members who advanced from the First Round will be undertaken in the Second Round evaluation of the promotions procedure. (...) UNDT/2016/056 Page 20 of 72 group in the Second Round to produce a list of “substantially equally meritorious” candidates for consideration by the Panel in the Third Round. 56.
Language:English
Score: 617669.73 - www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2016-056.pdf
Data Source: oaj
On 2 May 2014, the DHRM informed the Applicant that she had met the requirements to advance from the First Round to the Second Round of the Promotions Procedure. 8. (...) The Third Round provided an opportunity to probe the reasons for discrepancies in the Second Round rankings; vii. (...) All candidates who had passed the First Round were required to be assessed on their merits as one group in the Second Round to produce a list of “substantially equally meritorious” candidates for consideration by the Panel in the Third Round. 54.
Language:English
Score: 616762.6 - www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2016-055.pdf
Data Source: oaj
The Third Round provided an opportunity to probe the reasons for discrepancies in the Second Round rankings; vii. (...) More specifically, sec. 5.9.1 of the Promotions Policy provides the following in respect of the Second Round: 5.9.1 A comparative assessment of the staff members who advanced from the First Round will be undertaken in the Second Round evaluation of the promotions procedure. (...) All candidates who had passed the First Round were required to be assessed on their merits as one group in the Second Round to produce a list of “substantially equally meritorious” candidates for consideration by the SPP in the Third Round. 54.
Language:English
Score: 616608.94 - www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2016-031.pdf
Data Source: oaj
On 2 May 2014, the DHRM informed the Applicant that he had met the requirements to advance from the First Round to the Second Round of the Promotions Procedure. 9. (...) The Third Round provided an opportunity to probe the reasons for discrepancies in the Second Round rankings; vii. (...) All candidates who had passed the First Round were required to be assessed on their merits as one group in the Second Round to produce a list of “substantially equally meritorious” candidates for consideration by the SPP in the Third Round. 53.
Language:English
Score: 615930.6 - www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2016-030.pdf
Data Source: oaj
The Third Round provided an opportunity to probe the reasons for discrepancies in the Second Round rankings; vii. (...) More specifically, sec. 5.9.1 of the Promotions Policy provides the following in respect of the Second Round: 5.9.1 A comparative assessment of the staff members who advanced from the First Round will be undertaken in the Second Round evaluation of the promotions procedure. (...) All candidates who had passed the First Round were required to be assessed on their merits as one group in the Second Round to produce a list of “substantially equally meritorious” candidates for consideration by the SPP in the Third Round. 53.
Language:English
Score: 615811 - www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2016-033.pdf
Data Source: oaj
During the Third Round of review, the SPP conducted collectively a comparative assessment of the male and female candidates, again separately and based on the same evaluations criteria as those applicable in the Second Round. (...) Given the numerous and fundamental errors committed in the Second Round of review, the Applicant’s progression to the Third Round does not entail that she had better chances of being promoted in the course of this comparative assessment. Her individual rankings by the SPP during the Second Round, which were also used in the Third Round, go from one end of the spectrum Case No.
Language:English
Score: 615200.9 - www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2018-084.pdf
Data Source: oaj
On 2 May 2014, the DHRM informed the Applicant that she had met the requirements to advance from the First Round to the Second Round of the Promotions Procedure. 9. (...) More specifically, sec. 5.9.1 of the Promotions Policy provides the following in respect of the Second Round: 5.9.1 A comparative assessment of the staff members who advanced from the First Round will be undertaken in the Second Round evaluation of the promotions procedure. (...) All candidates who had passed the First Round were required to be assessed on their merits as one group in the Second Round to produce a list of “substantially equally meritorious” candidates for consideration by the SPP in the Third Round.
Language:English
Score: 613398.14 - www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2016-049.pdf
Data Source: oaj
Lessons learned from the 2010 round of censuses & planning for the 2020 round: M. (...) Lessons learned from the 2010 round of censuses & planning for the 2020 round: M. (...) Lessons learned from the 2010 round of censuses & planning for the 2020 round: M.
Language:English
Score: 604058.25 - https://www.un.org/development...gm-s2-mbogoni_presentation.pdf
Data Source: un
Third International Conference on Financing for Development Third International Conference on Financing for Development Invest Ahead - For People and Planet #FFD3 #Action2015 Home Overview Programme Initiatives Documents News & Media Blog Round Tables Monday 13/7 Tuesday 14/7 Wednesday 15/7 Thursday 16/7 CR 2 Round table 1 Round table 2 Round table 3 Round table 4 Round table 5 Round table 6 Six multi-stakeholder round tables were held in parallel with the Plenary Meetings . (...) Round tables 2, 4 and 6, on the theme:  Ensuring policy coherence and an enabling environment at all levels for sustainable development . Resources Procedural Guidelines Provisional Programme Background Note: Global Partnership and the three dimensions of sustainable development (Round tables 1, 3 and 5) Background Note: Ensuring policy coherence and an enabling environment at all levels for sustainable development (Round tables 2, 4 and 6) Watch round tables on UN WebTV Search Programme Overview Plenary Meetings Round Tables Side Events CSO Global Forum International Business Forum Engage #FFD3 on Twitter FFD3 Photos on Flickr FFD3 on YouTube UN DESA on Facebook FFD3 Blog © 2015 United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Financing for Development Office Contact       
Language:English
Score: 601054.2 - https://www.un.org/esa/ffd/ffd...ce/programme/round-tables.html
Data Source: un