On 12 September 2017, the Secretary-General issued a letter to all staff
members announcing his System-Wide Strategy on Gender Parity. The Strategy was
released on 13 September 2017.4
8.
Language:English
Score: 358264.23
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2019-155.pdf
Data Source: oaj
On 12 September 2017, the Secretary-General issued a letter to all staff
members announcing his System-Wide Strategy on Gender Parity. The Strategy was
released on 13 September 2017.
4
8.
Language:English
Score: 358264.23
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2019-166.pdf
Data Source: oaj
By letter dated 17 July 2020, the Under-Secretary-General for Management
Strategy, Policy and Compliance, advised the Applicant about the outcome of his
request for management evaluation, namely that she had decided to uphold the
contested decision.
Language:English
Score: 356519.85
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...s/undt/orders/gva-2020-083.pdf
Data Source: oaj
The Secretary-General’s strategy on gender parity was accorded
preference over the merit in the selection process. (...) While UNAMID recently hired a number of senior male
colleagues, the strategy on gender parity was only applied in this particular
case;
c. (...) She further
noted in her letter that the Management Evaluation Unit (MEU) considered that
the Applicant’s claim that “[he] [was] not selected for the post solely due to the
Secretary-General’s Strategy on Gender Parity (Gender Strategy) [was] not
supported by the facts.
Language:English
Score: 356456.6
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2018-065.pdf
Data Source: oaj
Security
Council Resolutions 1503 and 1534 directed the ICTR to initiate a completion
strategy which entailed, inter alia, a progressive reduction of the Organization’s
human resources capacity in line with its declining workload. (...) The effect of this approval
was that the posts which were slated for abolishment in December 2008 and later in
June 2009 as part of the completion strategy of the ICTR were allowed to continue as
Case No. (...) Therefore, the
Applicant’s due process rights were not violated in the decision not to retain him
pursuant to the closing strategy of the ICTR.
9. On 30 July 2010, the Registry of the UNDT in Nairobi transmitted the UNDT
Judgment to the Secretary-General, and the Applicant’s counsel on record, the Office
of Staff Legal Assistance (OSLA).
Language:English
Score: 354116.19
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2011-204.pdf
Data Source: oaj
The test
the Applicant received from DFS consisted of two primary questions requiring written responses:
Question 1 How should UN peacekeeping operations develop and implement their
public information strategies to most effectively reach target audiences, both local
(host country) and international? (...) He/she should be
experienced in drafting media/communication campaign strategy for the important global events
and know how to develop public information materials for print, electronic or broadcast media in
some conflict countries”.
11. (...) In the sanction letter, the Under-Secretary-General for Management Strategy, Policy and
Compliance (“USG/DMSPC”) informed the Applicant that it was established, by clear and
convincing evidence, that in April 2012, during a recruitment process for the JO, the Applicant
enlisted the assistance of a private individual using a commercial online platform, for a test for a
position with the Organization.
Language:English
Score: 354116.19
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2022-062.pdf
Data Source: oaj
On 22 December 2020, the Applicant, a staff member in the Department of
Management, Strategy, Policy and Compliance (“DMSPC”), appealed (a) the rejection
of his candidature for the post of Secretary of the Board of the United Nations Joint
Staff (“UNJSPF”), and (b) his subsequent reassignment to a temporary post in DMSPC.
2.
Language:English
Score: 353003.98
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...es/undt/orders/ny-2022-025.pdf
Data Source: oaj
On 24 December 2020, the Applicant, a staff member at the United Nations
Office of Counter Terrorism (“UNOCT”), Vienna, filed an application contesting
the decision dated 23 September 2020 by the Under-Secretary General for
Management Strategy, Policy and Compliance (“USG/DMSPC”) to sanction him
for misconduct for allegedly creating a hostile, offensive, and humiliating work
environment for four staff members at the Department of Software Products for
Member States (“SPMS”).
2.
Language:English
Score: 353003.98
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...s/undt/orders/gva-2022-068.pdf
Data Source: oaj
On 29 October 2019, the Applicant filed an application contesting the Under-
Secretary-General for Management Strategy, Policy and Compliance’s
(USG/DMSPC) decision to impose on him the disciplinary sanction of separation from
service with compensation in lieu of notice and with termination indemnity for serious
misconduct in accordance with staff rule 10.2(a)(viii).
3.
Language:English
Score: 353003.98
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...s/undt/orders/nbi-2020-050.pdf
Data Source: oaj
Page 1 of 39
UNITED NATIONS DISPUTE TRIBUNAL
Case No.: UNDT/NBI/2012/009
Judgment No.: UNDT/2013/151
Date: 29 November 2013
Original: English
Before: Judge Vinod Boolell
Registry:
Language:English
Score: 350774.58
-
www.un.org/en/internalj...dt/judgments/undt-2013-151.pdf
Data Source: oaj