Home

Whereas prosecutions are intended to fulfil a State’s duty to achieve individual accountability, they may only bring to light a limited amount and 2 These organisations were: Liberty, Redress, Amnesty International, Cageprisoners, the Aire Centre, Freedom from Torture, Human Rights Watch, Justice, Reprieve, and British Irish Rights Watch 3 Liberty, Redress, Amnesty International, Cageprisoners, Address, the Aire centre, Freedom from Torture, Human Rights Watch, Justice, Reprieve and British Irish Rights Watch letter to the chair of the inquiry. (...) Such an inquiry will be a very important step forward towards restoring this country’s reputation for strict adherence to international human rights standards.

S/16743 Russian Page 13 We are told that the "Tonggon" left Rangoon port legally without any hindrance under such strict watch of the Burmese authorities. This means that it is a groundless lie to claim that it left Rangoon port, leaving in Rangoon the seamen who had made a temporary landing. (...) (Japanese "Yomiuri Shimbun", November 24, 1983) "Asahi Shimbun" reported that "Rangoon which had been always on a strict alert was put under an uncommon guard" on the threshold of Chon Du Hwan's trip. (...) This is the biggest puzzle, because the south Korean guardsmen alone numbered 300 and a strict alert was ordered beforehand and the north Korean Embassy was under the watch of Burma from two months before the incident."

● The Caucasus Heritage Watch published a number of Monitoring Reports on the state of cultural heritage in Nagorno-Karabakh27. (...) Available at: https://monumentwatch.org/alerts/the- roads-of-azerbaijan-and-threats-to-the-armenian-cultural-heritage/ 27 Caucasus Heritage Watch website. Available at: https://caucasusheritage.cornell.edu/index.php/report 28 Khachadourian & al (2021), Caucasus Heritage Watch Monitoring Report #1, Cornell University. (...) Department of State places Azerbaijan on its Special Watch List for engaging in or tolerating severe religious freedom violations37.

In October 2015, the Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, YB Datuk Paul Low Seng Kuan announced the Government’s proposal to implement strict liability provisions, which need to be complied with by employers of migrant workers to ensure that they do not violate the rights 38 Loh Foon Fong, ‘Cabinet forms committee on indigenous land rights’, The Star Online, 17 June 2015, http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2015/06/17/cabinet-approves-indigenous-lands-rights/ (accessed 22 April 2016). (...) The proposed provisions include strict adherence to the minimum wage and the ban on withholding the employees’ passports as well as the requirement to provide proper accommodation facilities to the workers. SUHAKAM emphasises the need for strict enforcement of the aforesaid proposed provisions. 50.

On 29 January 2009, the state Government announced that about 30 police operations carried out since late 2007 had resulted in some 400 people being 15 “Milícias: politica do terror,” O Dia Online, 31 May 2008; Human Rights Watch, World Report 2009 – Brazil (January 2009) 16 Asembléa legislativa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (ALERJ), Relatório Final da Comissão Parlamentar de Inquérito destinada a investigar a ação de Milícias no âmbito do estado do Rio de Janeiro (November 2008). 17 Amnesty International, Report 2009: State of the World’s Human Rights (Brazil) (May 2009). 18 Idem. 19 Blog da Segurança, “PM acusado de chacina cuidava de filho de Cabral,” O Dia Online, 25 August 2009; Human Rights Watch, Lethal Force, p. 50. 20 “Grupo tramou assassinato de deputado,” O Dia Online, May 29, 2009 http://www2.amnesty.se/uaonnet.nsf/senastezope/495C62E518E8BEB2C12575CA00346135 ?opendocument; Human Rights Watch, supra note 10 at p.51. 21 A/HRC/11/2/Add.2, para. 38. (...) Department of State, 2008 Human Rights Report: Brazil; See also Human Rights Watch, Lethal Force, p. 44. 26 Amnesty International, Report 2009: State of the World’s Human Rights: Brazil (May 2009); see also Human Rights Watch, Lethal Force, p. 45. 27 ”Brazil Death Squad Suspected of 300 Murders,” Latin American Herald Tribune, 7 January 2010. 28 ALERJ, supra note 16, p. 40.

However, restrictions on women’s autonomy is said to often curtail their ability to manage and control their property. 25 For more details on guardianship see, Human Rights Watch, “Perpetual minors: human rights abuses stemming from male guardianship and sex segregation in Saudi Arabia”, 2008. (...) Employers who do not pay their workers’ wages on time are liable to a penalty and 40 See Human Rights Watch, “As if I’m not human: Abuses against Asian migrant workers in Saudi Arabia”, 2008: 15-16. 41 For instance, a woman who had been recruited in the Philippines to work as a beautician was forced to work as a maid. (...) Foreign women, and particularly domestic workers, are disproportionately affected by Saudi Arabia’s strict sex segregation and restrictive practices towards women.

The law on Data Protection (PIPA) is relatively strict and follows standards which, in many cases, come close to those of the EU’s GDPR. (...) Yet organisations like Human Rights Watch also correctly reported some of the internal criticisms and on-going debate during 2020 “In March, the National Human Rights Commission of Korea criticized authorities for these practices.8 43. (...) Ultimately, and together with strict oversight and adherence to the law, it would help the National Intelligence Service to gain trust from Korean citizens. 60.

./ Information Group on Reproductive Choice; GIEACPC Global Initiative to End Corporal Punishment of Children, London (United Kingdom); HRW Human Rights Watch, Geneva (Switzerland); IDMC-NRC Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre/Norwegian Refugee Centre, Geneva (Switzerland); IHRC-OU International Human Rights Clinic – University of Oklahoma, United States of America; OMCT World Organisation Against Torture, Geneva (Switzerland); Paso a Paso Fundacion Paso a Paso, Hidalgo (México); PI Privacy International, London (United Kingdom); A/HRC/WG.6/17/MEX/3 GE.13-16016 15 RWB Reporters Without Borders, France; SCMx Save the Children México, Mexico City, Mexico. (...) C.; Programa Universitario de Estudios de Género –UNAM; Red de Investigadoras por la Vida y la Libertad de las Mujeres; Red de Mujeres Sindicalistas; Red de Profesores/as e Investigadores/as de la Cátedra UNESCO de la UNAM; Seminario de Bioética, Derecho a la salud y Educación de la Benemérita; Universidad Autónoma de Puebla; JS 17 Joint submission No. 17 by Lawyers for Lawyers (L4L), Amsterdam (The Netherlands); The Law Society of England and Wales, London (United Kingdom); Lawyers’ Rights Watch Canada (LRWC), Vancouver B.C. (Canada); JS 18 – PEN Joint submission No. 18 by PEN International , London (United Kingdom) and PEN Guadalajara, México; JS 19 – REDIM Joint submission No. 19 by Red por los Derechos de la Infancia en México; JS 20 – Tlachinollan-HRC Morelos Joint submission No. 20 by Centro Regional para la Defensa de los Derechos Humanos “José María Morelos y Pavón, Guerrero (México) y el Centro de Derechos Humanos de la Montaña “Tlachinollan”, Guerrero (México); National human rights institution CNDH de México Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos*, México D.F.