Home

(Author) Title Follow- up Agenda item 1 (GRSG Chair) Running order of the 118th virtual session of GRSG (15-17 July 2020) (e) 1 2 (BMFE) Suggestion for amendment of UN Regulation No. 107 (M2 and M3 vehicles) (c) 2 3 (Spain) Proposal for amendments to UN Regulation No. 107 (c) 2a 4 (BMFE) Suggestion for amendment of UN Regulation No. 118 (Burning behaviour of materials) (c) 2b 5 (VRU-Proxi) Proposal for amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2020/4 (a) 5 6 (VRU-Proxi) Proposal for a new UN Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the Moving Off Information System for the Detection of Pedestrians and Cyclists (a) 5 7 (VRU-Proxi) Proposal for revision of the Terms of Reference and rules of Procedure of the GRSG informal working group on awareness of Vulnerable Road Users proximity in low speed manoeuvres (VRU-Proxi) (e) 5 8 (Germany) Analysis of Dooring accidents and a proposal for a corresponding Driver Assistance System (e) 5 9 (VRU-Proxi) Proposal for Supplement 2 to UN Regulation No. 151 (Blind Spot Information Systems (BSIS)) (a) 5b 10 (Germany) UN Regulation No. 116 and innovative vehicle alarm systems / anti- theft systems (e) 10 11 (IMMA) Proposal to amend Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3) (c) 14 12 (EDR/DSSAD) Status Report (e) 15 13 (EDR/DSSAD) Event Data Recorder (EDR) Performance Elements Appropriate for Adoption in 1958 and 1998 Agreements (b) 15 14 (EDR/DSSAD) Proposal for a new UN Regulation on Event Data Recorder (b) 15 15 (Chair) Proceedings of the 118th session of GRSG (e) 0 16 (BMFE) Behaviour of M2 & M3 general construction in case of Fire Event (e) 2 17 (BMFE) Suggestion for amendment of UN Regulation No. 125 (Forward field of Vision of Drivers) (c) 11 18 (IMMA) Proposal to introduce bodied L7 vehicles in R.E.3 (c) 14 19 (OICA) Proposal for a draft new UN Regulation on Devices Against Unauthorized Use (c) 10 20 (OICA) Proposal for a new UN Regulation on uniform technical prescriptions concerning approval of immobilizers and approval of a vehicle with regard to its immobilizer (c) 10 21 (OICA) Proposal for a draft new UN Regulation on Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicle alarm system and approval of a vehicle with regard to its vehicle alarm system (c) 10 22 (OICA) Proposal for amendments to UN Regulation No. 18 (Uniform provisions concerning the approval of category M1 and N1, with regard to their protection against unauthorized use) (c) 10 ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/97 GE.20-12368 13 No. (Author) Title Follow- up Agenda item 23 (OICA) Proposal for amendments to UN Regulation No. 97 (Uniform provisions concerning the approval of category M1, and those of category N1 with a maximum mass of not more than 2 tonnes, with regard to their alarm system(s) and immobilizers) (c) 10 24 (OICA) Proposal for amendments to UN Regulation No. 116 (Uniform provisions concerning the protection of motor vehicles against unauthorized use) (c) 10 25 (OICA) Regulation n°116 - Split for IWVTA: February 2020 status (a) 10 26 (OICA) Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments of UN Regulation No. 125 (a) 11 27 (OICA) Table of GRSG Regulations - Review for automated driving (a) 16 28 (OICA) UN Regulation No. 93 - OICA comments to proposal (a) 9 29 (China) Proposal for EDR Performance Elements (a) 15 30 (Germany) Proposal for the 09 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 107 (Uniform provisions concerning the approval of category M2 or M3 vehicles with regard to their general construction) (e) 2a 31 (Germany) Suggestion for amendment of UN Regulation No. 118(Burning behaviour of materials) (a) 2b 32 (OICA) OICA statement on the draft regulation on MOIS (e) 5 33 (Secretariat) Guidelines for virtual meeting participation (c) 0 34 (Secretariat) Consolidated revised provisional agenda for the 118th session (e) 1 35 (Finland) Proposal for revision of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2020/08 (b) 6 36 (EC) Moving Off Information Signal (MOIS) Regulation (b) 5 116-09- Rev.2 (OICA) Highlights on the splitting of UN Regulation No. 116 (e) 10 117-31- Rev.1 Proposal for amendments to UN Regulation No. 116 (e) 10 37 (Russian Federation) DRAFT Amendment proposals to UN Regulation No. 66 (c) 17 38 (Secretariat) Items for decision under silence procedure (e) Notes: (a) Adopted/endorsed with no change for consideration at WP.29.

Martin Scheinin about the severe limitations the Anti- Terror Law may put on the freedom of expression, association and assembly.“ A/HRC/4/G/8 page 4 12. The suggestion that “the provisions of the Anti-Terror Law may severely limit the exercise of the freedom of expression, association and assembly” is groundless. (...) In paragraph 77 and 98 of the report it is indicated that the situation of terror suspects is a major stain on Turkey’s efforts to eliminate arbitrary detention which cannot be justified with reference to the Government’s uncontested duty to combat terrorism. 24. The suggestion that “arbitrary” detentions occur in connection with charges or convictions on terrorism, is unsubstantiated. (...) In other words, with the extension under exceptional circumstances the total duration of remand cannot exceed 6 years. Therefore, the suggestion that “the duration of detention on remand may reach ten years for terrorist crimes” is inaccurate and reflects a misinterpretation of the provision.

In response to one participant’s suggestion that States could not be circumvented because they represented the people, others pointed out that that view was State-centric in nature and would constrain the way in which international solidarity should be discussed. 25. (...) There was also some discussion as to whether the right existed. One suggestion was that focusing on a right to international solidarity would give greater visibility to existing concepts, especially by calling it international solidarity. (...) The view was expressed that the right could be defined as a right to policies being adopted, or a “metaright”, which would be effected through impact assessments. Another suggestion was to couch the definition in the language of the right of people to have States act in solidarity to tackle common challenges. 36.

Puisque le Rapporteur spécial considère que cette question devrait être examinée dans le contexte de la responsabilité de l’État, la Commission doit rechercher la meilleure manière de relier les deux ensembles de règles sur la responsabilité. La suggestion de M. Saboia, pour qui la Commission devrait demander l’avis de l’Assemblée générale sur la question, mérite d’être étudiée. (...) Wisnumurti appuie par conséquent la suggestion de M. McRae tendant à supprimer le membre de phrase en question. (...) Melescanu appuie la rédaction proposée pour le projet d’article 19, mais il approuve également la suggestion de M. Nolte tendant à remplacer les mots «moyens raisonnables» par «procédure raisonnable», expression qui semble plus appropriée.

The draft comments of the correspondence group as reflected in the letter to the Basel Convention Executive Secretary are based on a suggestion that the Parties to the Basel Convention may wish to consider closer coordination with the GHS in the context of defining the hazardous characteristics of wastes under the Basel Convention while satisfying the needs of both international instruments. (...) It is also recognised that the hazards of wastes due to the impurities created during the use of the chemical will need to be considered for hazard identification. Suggestion 16. The Subcommittee suggests that the experts and secretariats of the Basel Convention and the SCEGHS may wish to explore the relationship between hazard characterization of wastes under the Basel Convention and the GHS classification system, and identify possible links between them. (...) The Subcommittee may wish to recognise that the H10 characteristic on liberation of toxic gases may involve substances other than water (like acids), and thus may not be limited to cases where toxic gases are released in contact with water. Suggestion 27. The Subcommittee may wish to propose that GHS classification criteria for substances and mixtures which in contact with water release toxic/corrosive gases be considered by the Basel Convention OEWG during its deliberations on the further definition of characteristic of H10, liberation of toxic gases in contact with air or water.

GE.21-19870 (R) 280122 080222 Европейская экономическая комиссия Комитет по внутреннему транспорту Всемирный форум

f Multilateral climate change funds listed in paragraph 17(b) of the UNFCCC biennial reporting guidelines for developed country Parties in decision 2/CP.17. g [Suggestion to provide contribution in the total Official Development Aid was made.] (...) Description box: FC C C /SBSTA /2012/L .33 G E .12 -71165 31 Table 7(b) a Provision of public financial support: Contribution through bilateral, regional and other channels for the year 20XX-3b Total amount Statusc Funding sourcec Financial instrumentc Type of supportc Sector, c,d [Recipient country/ region/programme] e Domestic currency USD [Provided, Pledged, Committed]f ODA OOF Otherg Grant Concessional loan Otherg Mitigation Adaptation Core/general Climate-specific Otherg Energy Transport Industry Agriculture Water and sanitation Otherg Abbreviations: ODA = official development assistance, OOF = other official flows. a [Suggestion to separate table 7(b) into two tables, one for bilateral and one for regional and other channels, has been made.] (...) d Parties may report sectoral disaggregation, as appropriate. e [Suggestion has been made that Parties still need to discuss more detail for the reporting of project level.]

MURRAY HILL 7.а2в4 DESECRATION OF HOLY PLACE OF ISLAM, THE AL-AQSA MOSOJJE SECOND HOLIEST FOR ALL MOSLEMS "An Israeli soldier with a sub-machine gun on his lap stopped me at the gate of the mosque this week as I was about to enter among the crowd of Israeli tourists, and asked me to cover my head in respect for the Jewish faith. He rejected my suggestion that I should take off my shoes as well out of respect for Islam Most of the place (was) converted into something like a museum

It is stated in paragraph 24 of the report that “the judges serving at the Serious Felony Courts (hereinafter referred to as “Heavy Penal Courts”) are not military judges anymore, however, several of the Special Rapporteur’s interlocutors stressed that the same persons often remained in office who had been judges at the State Security Courts”. 25. This suggestion raises doubts about the independence and impartiality of the newly established special chambers of Heavy Penal Courts to examine crimes under Article 250 of the Criminal Procedure Code. (...) Kalin and other stakeholders. 42. The suggestion in paragraph 39 that “the Turkish authorities view the population in Makhmour Camp with suspicion of links to terrorist organization” does not reflect the reality. 43. (...) These experts, by nature of their post, have no connection with or involvement in counter-terrorism measures. Therefore, the suggestion that “members of the Commissions may have been involved in the acts for which compensation is awarded” is totally groundless and unacceptable.

We therefore support any step which would strengthen the interaction in this regard between the Human Rights Council and the Committee, and especially your suggestion to have formal and informal meetings with Member States, which was very well received by the Committee. (...) Furthermore, on behalf of the Committee, I would also like to follow up on the suggestion you made during the meeting, notably the possibility for the Committee to identify in a memorandum addressed to the President and Bureau of the Council a list of specific research proposals for the consideration of the Council.