Home

Results 1 - 10 of 5,530 for swapping. Search took 1.312 seconds.  
Sort by date/Sort by relevance
Milestones January 2005 – Initiation of Safe Water and AIDS Project June 2006 – Registration of SWAP as an Non Governmental Organization October 2006 – SWAP won World Bank Development Marketplace Award January 2007 – SWAP established research wing supported by CDC, WHO, and private donors October 2007 – SWAP got USAID sub-award for 5 years through PSI 3. (...) SWAP was able to exceed the targets because of support from various donors and demand for participation from the community that is greater than SWAP’s capacity to respond. (...) The water will be sold to local communities as an income generating activity for SWAP. On the grounds of the water treatment plant, SWAP will build a model village in which SWAP interventions will be showcased.
Language:English
Score: 1136261.8 - https://www.un.org/waterforlif...egory_2_swap_narrative_eng.pdf
Data Source: un
SWAps originally arose in the 1990s to enhance aid effectiveness, but it remains clear that national governments must be firmly in the lead to promote and implement SWAps. (...) SWAps and National Agricultural Investment Plans (NAIPs) SWAps have existed since the mid-1990s. (...) The NAIP is a sector-wide instrument and can be seen as a SWAp. In some countries it is replacing SWAps. There is a discussion around the question whether or not a NAIP is a SWAp, but it is important to not get lost in semantics.
Language:English
Score: 1131638.1 - https://www.fao.org/investment...orm/themes-and-tasks/swaps/en/
Data Source: un
SWAps originally arose in the 1990s to enhance aid effectiveness, but it remains clear that national governments must be firmly in the lead to promote and implement SWAps. (...) SWAps and National Agricultural Investment Plans (NAIPs) SWAps have existed since the mid-1990s. (...) The NAIP is a sector-wide instrument and can be seen as a SWAp. In some countries it is replacing SWAps. There is a discussion around the question whether or not a NAIP is a SWAp, but it is important to not get lost in semantics.
Language:English
Score: 1131638.1 - https://www.fao.org/investment...orm/themes-and-tasks/swaps/fr/
Data Source: un
SWAps originally arose in the 1990s to enhance aid effectiveness, but it remains clear that national governments must be firmly in the lead to promote and implement SWAps. (...) SWAps and National Agricultural Investment Plans (NAIPs) SWAps have existed since the mid-1990s. (...) The NAIP is a sector-wide instrument and can be seen as a SWAp. In some countries it is replacing SWAps. There is a discussion around the question whether or not a NAIP is a SWAp, but it is important to not get lost in semantics.
Language:English
Score: 1129351.4 - https://www.fao.org/investment...orm/themes-and-tasks/swaps/zh/
Data Source: un
SWAps originally arose in the 1990s to enhance aid effectiveness, but it remains clear that national governments must be firmly in the lead to promote and implement SWAps. (...) SWAps and National Agricultural Investment Plans (NAIPs) SWAps have existed since the mid-1990s. (...) The NAIP is a sector-wide instrument and can be seen as a SWAp. In some countries it is replacing SWAps. There is a discussion around the question whether or not a NAIP is a SWAp, but it is important to not get lost in semantics.
Language:English
Score: 1129351.4 - https://www.fao.org/investment...orm/themes-and-tasks/swaps/es/
Data Source: un
DGACM final 2018 SWAP 2.0 Reporting Results Results of UN-SWAP 2.0 Reporting 1 2018 UN-SWAP Performance by Indicator: DGACM Impressively, in 2018 DGACM "exceeded" requirements for 9 indicators, including: Both the newly strengthened PI5 on Audit and PI17 on Coherence The new PI7 on Leadership DGACM New* New* New* New* Strengthened* Strengthened* Strengthened* Strengthened* *Relative to UN-SWAP 1.0 Split* 2018 constitutes the first year of reporting against UN-SWAP 2.0, an expanded and enhanced framework with 4 new indicators and 4 strengthened indicators. (...) In 2018, DGACM "met" or "exceeded" requirements for 11 out of 17 UN-SWAP 2.0 indicators. Most significant gains Areas for improvement Comparative Performance 2017-2018, indicators carried over from UN-SWAP 1.0: DGACM Between 2017 and 2018, DGACM maintained its performance for all 7 indicators that were carried over from UN-SWAP 1.0. (...) To maintain this rating, senior managers must continue to proactively promote improvements in UN-SWAP 2.0 Performance Indicators. Highlights from new UN-SWAP 2.0 Indicators Leadership (PI7) Results of UN-SWAP 2.0 Reporting DGACM This new indicator focuses on ways in which senior managers can directly promote gender equality and the empowerment of women.
Language:English
Score: 1121113 - https://www.un.org/dgacm/sites...swap_2.0_reporting_results.pdf
Data Source: un
In addition, the UN SWAP provides a monitoring framework that is expected to motivate action and investments to meet these standards. (...) Possible questions to be addressed could include: • How have the entities of the United Nations system contributed so far to the implementation of UN-SWAP? 2 • What are the experiences to date? How are individual entities taking the UN-SWAP and embedding it into their own work? (...) • How can the UN system effectively draw on its combined strengths to support the implementation of accountability mechanisms such as UN-SWAP and where can coordination be better streamlined in order to accelerate progress in implementation of the UN-SWAP, including for funding purposes?
Language:English
Score: 1111887.3 - https://www.un.org/en/ecosoc/j...s_gs_panel_discussion_geew.pdf
Data Source: un
DGACM Infographic UN-SWAP 2.0 SUMMARY, ANALYSIS AND KEY INSIGHTS FROM 2019 UNITED NATIONS DEPARTMENT FOR GENERAL ASSEMBLY AND CONFERENCE MANAGEMENT (DGACM) UN-SWAP 2.0 SUMMARY OF 2019 REPORTING RESULTS TABLE OF CONTENT UN SYSTEM-WIDE PERFORMANCE 2019 3 DGACM PERFORMANCE 2019 5 DGACM GENDER PARITY SNAPSHOT 2019 This information package summarizes UN-SWAP 2.0 performance for the 6OJUFE/BUJPOTTZTUFNBTB XIPMF BOE JO QBSUJDVMBS GPS UIF United Nations Department for General Assembly and Conference Management. Sixty-eight UN entities reported in 2019, up from 66 entities in recent years and 55 in the first year of reporting, 2012. 8 Other Top Performing Indicators in 2019 Knowledge and Communication (PI.16), Leadership (PI.7) and Policy (PI.6) √ √ Areas for improvement KEY FINDINGS OVERALL UN SYSTEM, COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RATINGS BY YEAR | PERCENTAGE OF ALL RATINGS UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM-WIDE PERFORMANCE BY INDICATOR (2019) | PERCENTAGE OF ALL RATINGS Financial resource allocation (PI.10) and Equal representation of women (PI.12) • In 2019, the UN system met 60 per cent of UN-SWAP 2.0 minimum requirements across all indicators, registering a 2-percentage point increase from 2018 • Ratings exceeding require- ments reached 28 per cent, increasing 5-percentage points PI. 1 Strategic Planning Gender-Related SDG Results PI. 2 Reporting on Gender-Related SDG Results PI. 3 Programmatic Gender-Related SDG Results PI. 4 Evaluation PI. 5 Audit PI. 6 Policy PI. 7 Leadership PI. 8 Gender-responsive performance management PI. 9 Financial Resource Tracking PI. 10 Financial Resource Allocation PI. 11 Gender Architecture PI. 12 Equal Representation of Women PI. 13 Organizational Culture PI. 14 Capacity Assessment PI. 15 Capacity Development PI. 16 Knowledge and Communication PI. 17 Coherence 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Highest Performing Indicators in 2019 Audit (PI.5) and Gender responsive performance management (PI.8) UN-SWAP 2.0 SYSTEM-WIDE PERFORMANCE 2019 10 9 7 8 25 23 35 32 23 28 2018 2019 Not Applicable Missing Approaches Meets Exceeds Not Applicable Missing Approaches Meets Exceeds UN SWAP 2.0 | 3 NUMBER OF ENTITIES CONTRIBUTING TO EACH SDG 5 TARGET NUMBER OF ENTITIES CONTRIBUTING TO RESULTS IN EACH THEMATIC AREA GENDER-RELATED SDG RESULTS IN STRATEGIC PLANNING • Three UN-SWAP 2.0 indicators address the achievement of gender-related results in the context of the SDGs • Based on 68 entities’ UN-SWAP reporting this graph shows the number of entities contributing to each SDG goal • • The UN system primarily contrib- utes to gender-related Goals in socio-economic and human rights areas (SDGs 1, 5, 8, 16, 17) Thereclearly remains space for entitiesto incorporate gender equality inmore technical areas (SDGs 7, 9, 12) • 55 entities integrated Goal 5 in their main strategic document • The majority of entities target participation and leadership in political, economic and public life (target 5.5) followed by a focus on ending violence against BMMXPNFOBOEHJSMTBOEBMM UZQFTPG exploitation (target 5.2) • The graph shows UIFnumber of entities contributing toeach thematic area • High-level results on gender equality are related to Women’s Engagement and Participation for 34 entities • Only 5 entities focus on Financing for Gender Equality, bringing to light a concerning gap UN-SWAP 2.0 SYSTEM-WIDE PERFORMANCE 2019 UN SWAP 2.0 | 4 16 5 9 8 55 5 3 11 5 11 9 2 8 4 5 14 14 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 SDG 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 SDG 5.1 SDG 5.2 SDG 5.3 SDG 5.4 SDG 5.5 SDG 5.6 SDG 5.A SDG 5.B SDG 5.C 27 29 16 17 40 17 18 15 18 UN System Change Access to Gender Responsive Services Ending Violence Against Women Women's Engagement and Participation Norms and Standards Women's Economic Empowerment Knowledge Financing for Gender Equality 34 24 2322 20 19 15 5 UNITED NATIONS DEPARTMENT FOR GENERAL ASSEMBLY AND CONFERENCE MANAGEMENT (DGACM) UN-SWAP 2.0 PERFORMANCE 2019 The following three pages capture DGACM’s performance on UN-SWAP 2.0 indicators for 2019. (...) COMPARISON WITH THE SECRETARIAT AND THE OVERALL UN SYSTEMŏ DGACM, COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RATINGS BY YEAR DGACM UN SECRETARIAT UN SYSTEM 92% 69% 66% UN-SWAP 2.0 PERFORMANCE 2019DGACM Not Applicable Missing Approaches Meets Exceeds Not Applicable Missing Approaches Meets Exceeds UN SWAP 2.0 | 7 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS FOR DGACM v In 2019, %("$.FYDFFEFE SFRVJSFNFOUTGPSBOBEEJUJPOBM JOEJDBUPSBTDPNQBSFEXJUI v $PNNFOEBCMZ, DGACM JTSFQPSUJOH POPOFOFXJOEJDBUPSUIBUXBT QSFWJPVTMZNBSLFEBTOPU BQQMJDBCMF.
Language:English
Score: 1099009.7 - https://www.un.org/dgacm/sites...-swap_2.0_report_card_2019.pdf
Data Source: un
Moreover, the 2015 Addis Ababa Action Agenda on Financing for Development encourages highly-indebted developing countries to use debt-to-nature swaps. Focus areas Financing for development Macroeconomics Climate change 2030 Agenda Our approach ESCWA launched the Climate/SDGs Debt Swap Mechanism (Debt Swap/Donor Nexus Initiative) to support member States in their struggle with climate finance, high debt burdens, and fiscal pressures that have been exacerbated by the adverse impact of the pandemic. (...) Our activities ESCWA launched the Debt Swap/Donor Nexus Initiative in December 2020 at a high-level conference that brought together ministers, senior officials and technical experts from selected member States. It held in March 2021 the first advisory committee meeting on operationalizing the Climate/SDGs Debt Swap Mechanism and published the Climate/SDGs Debt Swap Mechanism report.
Language:English
Score: 1098297.95 - https://www.unescwa.org/debt-swap
Data Source: un
DEBT FOR CLIMATE ADAPTATION THE INITIATIVE SWAP INITIATIVE FOR CARIBBEAN SIDS The approach to debt reduction has two dimensions: (i) For countries with high debt from official creditors, the Green Climate Fund (GCF) will be requested to purchase multilateral and bilateral debt owed at a negotiated discount; (ii) For countries with high debt from private creditors, a debt buyback scheme will be utilized, as well as debt for equity swaps. (...) The ECLAC Debt for Climate Adaptation Swap Initiative is a response to the two most urgent development needs facing the Caribbean: debt and vulnerability. (...) Note: Arrows indicate financial flows. Pre-swap Creditors Debtor countries Debt service payments Post ECLAC Debt Swap initiative Creditors Debtor countries Debt service on remaining debt CRF Total debt reduction value Haircut value Debt swap value (Total debt reduction less haircut) Debt service on debt swap value Green investment (incl. climate adaptation and mitigation projects) Other funding sources The ECLAC Debt for Climate Swap Initiative is ready for take-off and its implementation should be accelerated.
Language:English
Score: 1096420 - https://www.cepal.org/sites/de...-debt_initiative_flyer-web.pdf
Data Source: un