Home

.: General 4 September 2019 Chinese Original: English A/HRC/42/NI/4 2 GE.19-15148 Annex Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission: mid-term report on the Human Rights Council’s Universal Periodic Review of the United Kingdom The Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission (NIHRC) is a statutory public body established in 1999 to promote and protect human rights. (...) In response to the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) 3rd cycle recommendations, the UK Government reiterated its full commitment to the UPR process, volunteering to publish an update report by May 20181 and a mid-term report by May this year. The mid-term report is now overdue. (...) Dealing with the past 1st cycle: 12 A 2nd cycle: 110.92 R 3rd cycle: 134.156 N 134.157 N In December 2014, the Stormont House Agreement was concluded between the main NI political parties and the UK and Irish Governments. 11 The Stormont House Agreement proposed, inter alia, the establishment of a single independent investigatory body, the Historical Investigations Unit, to carry out investigations into over 1,200 conflict-related deaths.

The Head of State is elected by universal suffrage for a five-year term and the President appoints the Prime Minister, who forms the Government, presides over the Council of Ministers, promulgates laws and is the Commander of the Armed Forces. (...) Extreme acts of violence have also occurred, underscoring the long-term nature and complexity of the challenges France has faced, including the Vitry-le-François train bombing of 1961 in which 28 persons were killed and over 100 injured. (...) It embodies the principle of national solidarity, supports the legal capacities and autonomy of victims and provides responsive measures to meet the immediate and long-term needs of victims. The robustness of the country’s system in respect of victims is enabled by a compulsory levy on property insurance policies.

A/HRC/29/27/Add.3 12 GE.15-09489 are expected to define short-term imprisonment as ranging from three months to one year; medium-term imprisonment as one year to five years, and long-term imprisonment as 5 to 15 years or 15 to 20 years, depending on the crime.22 40. (...) The funding of shelters by international donors is crucial as a long-term solution to the housing needs of women and girls. (...) They do not have the option of returning home or to their communities and thus shelters become a long-term residential solution for women and their children.

The post-Second World War period was marked by massive house building to address bomb damage and pre-existing slum conditions. (...) The steady increase in prices in the long term, and the volatile conditions in the short run, have led to a reduction in access and affordability for middle- and low-income households, and has exposed some borrowers to increased risks. (...) The judge based his decision on the definition of bedroom: “The term ‘bedroom’ is nowhere defined [in the relevant regulations].

Maori face much higher rates of inadequate housing and homelessness and continue to experience the long-term impact of forced displacement, leading to social and community disintegration. (...) Between June 2001 and June 2019, median house prices rose by an alarming 234.3 per cent. (...) A/HRC/47/43/Add.1 10 GE.21-05608 behaviour within a 90-day period, and all newly concluded fixed-term tenancies will become periodic tenancies at the end of the fixed term, unless the owner and tenant agree otherwise.

Under article 24.8 of the Constitution, pretrial detention may not exceed six months for cases punishable by an ordinary prison term, or one year for cases punishable by long-term imprisonment. (...) Pretrial detention may not exceed six months for cases punishable by an ordinary prison term, or one year for cases punishable by long-term imprisonment. (...) Article 51 of the Criminal Code, as supplemented by article 1 of Act No. 2001-47, establishes, among other things, sentences of three levels of severity： reclusión mayor (long-term rigorous imprisonment)， reclusión menor (medium-term rigorous imprisonment)， and prisión (ordinary imprisonment).

In resolution 6/34, the Council requested the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Sudan to ensure effective follow-up and to foster the implementation of the remaining short-term and the medium-term recommendations identified in the first report of the Group of Experts (A/HRC/5/6) through an open and constructive dialogue with the Government of the Sudan, taking into account the final report of the Group of Experts (A/HRC/6/19) and the replies of the Government thereon, and to include information in this regard in her report to the Council at its ninth session. 4. (...) (a) To cooperate and work in a transparent manner with the Government of the Sudan and other relevant partners of the international community; (b) To identify obstacles to the implementation of previous recommendations; (c) To differentiate short-term from medium-term recommendations with a view to assisting the Government of the Sudan to implement fully the recommendations identified and to keep the victims of past and ongoing human rights violations of human rights and humanitarian law in central focus, with the aim of reducing such violations in the future. 8. (...) However several recommendations which were prioritized as short-term and could have been implemented within a short term time frame, as they did not require lengthy administrative processes or additional resources, have not yet been implemented.

Using the indicators contained in the annex to the Group’s report submitted to the Council (A/HRC/5/6), the independent expert provides an assessment of the Government’s activities in implementing the recommendations to be achieved in the short- and medium- term, as well as the degree of impact reported on the ground in Darfur. (...) The independent expert continued to follow the methodology used by the Group of Experts in its work： (a) To cooperate and work in a transparent manner with the Government of the Sudan and other relevant partners of the international community； (b) To identify obstacles to the implementation of previous recommendations； (c) To differentiate short-term from medium-term recommendations with a view to assisting the Government of the Sudan to implement fully the recommendations identified and to keep the victims of past and ongoing human rights violations of human rights and humanitarian law in central focus, with the aim of reducing such violations in the future. 7. (...) He A/HRC/18/40/Add.1 GE.11-15533 11 notes that, in certain specific instances, the feasibility of full implementation could have been affected by the absence of sufficient resources and technical assistance； however, several recommendations on protection against summary execution, arbitrary detention and torture, which were prioritized as short-term and could have been implemented within a short-term time frame (as they did not require lengthy administrative processes or additional resources) have not yet been implemented.

This includes people renting caravans on a medium- to long-term basis where no one in the caravan has a full-time job. (...) Numerous testimonies were given to the Special Rapporteur of long-term homeless situations and the lack of possibilities to end the cycle of homelessness. (...) This hampers an effective, urgent and long-term strategy to address the situation, which in some cases could be qualified as a humanitarian crisis. 65.

The independent expert notes that in using the term minorities, the focus of her work is on distinct groups within societies that have faced long-term discrimination and disadvantage on the basis of identity as belonging to a national, ethnic, religious or linguistic group. (...) The independent expert welcomes the intervention of the House of Federation in issues which fall within its jurisdiction. 24. (...) The work of such organizations is extremely valuable, and their continued presence is considered essential to addressing the immediate and long-term needs of communities in the region, and to promoting peace and stability.