The digital radio that support ADS-B and standardized by ICAO are:
* 1090 MHz extended squitter (ES)
* VDL Mode 4
* UAT
ATSC Displays
Radar ADSBP RECAIPRDP CDP
ADS-B Rx
Radar & Tracker
ADS-B ADS-B
Radar Surveillance ADS-B Surveillance
Automation System
ADS-B Ground Station
- -
Transponder
ADS-B Avionic s
ADSFDP
ADSADSADSADS----CCCC
SurveillanceSurveillanceSurveillanceSurveillance
1090 MHz Extended Squitter
* Recognized as the most common element in early implementations of ADS-B (11th Air Navigation Conference, Rec.7/1)
* Standardized by ICAO (Annex 10, Volumes III and IV supplemented by a new manual)
* Certified airborne equipment and ground stations (for air-to-ground ADS-B) commercially available
ObstacleObstacleObstacleObstacle A/C on groundA/C on groundA/C on groundA/C on ground
Surface vehicleSurface vehicleSurface vehicleSurface vehicle TISTISTISTIS----B B B B
StationStationStationStation
A/C in flightA/C in flightA/C in flightA/C in flight
ES rate is slightly randomized ES rate is slightly randomized ES rate is slightly randomized ES rate is slightly randomized
and varies from 2/s (for and varies from 2/s (for and varies from 2/s (for and varies from 2/s (for
position/velocity) 0.2/s (for position/velocity) 0.2/s (for position/velocity) 0.2/s (for position/velocity) 0.2/s (for
identification)identification)identification)identification)
Radar
ADS-B
Other A/C Data
Broadcast of Broadcast of Broadcast of Broadcast of
A/C Positions by A/C Positions by A/C Positions by A/C Positions by
ESESESES
Aircraft has to be Aircraft has to be Aircraft has to be Aircraft has to be
equipped with ES equipped with ES equipped with ES equipped with ES
receiver/display receiver/display receiver/display receiver/display
to use the serviceto use the serviceto use the serviceto use the service
1090 ES Signal In Space
Preamble (8 uS) Data block (112 uS)
Bit 1: 1 uS
1
Same as for Mode S reply to ground interrogation
Bit 3
0
Bit 112
1
1090 MHz Carrier
ES signal can be emitted from Mode S transponders or non-transponder (NT)
devices (airborne or else)
DF 17 24-Bits A/C
AddressCA Parity
56 Bits
DF 18 24-Bits A/C
AddressCF Parity
56 Bits
112 Bits
Indicates
ADS-B,
TIS-B, etc
Version 0:Version 0:Version 0:Version 0: In Annex 10 since 2002In Annex 10 since 2002In Annex 10 since 2002In Annex 10 since 2002
Version 1:Version 1:Version 1:Version 1: Being processedBeing processedBeing processedBeing processed
Version number only affects the message Version number only affects the message Version number only affects the message Version number only affects the message
contentscontentscontentscontents
The two versions are interoperable (as per The two versions are interoperable (as per The two versions are interoperable (as per The two versions are interoperable (as per SARPsSARPsSARPsSARPs))))
Version 1 has more elaborate indication of Version 1 has more elaborate indication of Version 1 has more elaborate indication of Version 1 has more elaborate indication of
accuracy and integrity. accuracy and integrity. accuracy and integrity. accuracy and integrity.
Both versions to be in a new manual.Both versions to be in a new manual.Both versions to be in a new manual.Both versions to be in a new manual.
(...) Annex 10, volume IV (Broad Annex 10, volume IV (Broad Annex 10, volume IV (Broad Annex 10, volume IV (Broad SARPsSARPsSARPsSARPs on ES)on ES)on ES)on ES)
Doc NNNN Doc NNNN Doc NNNN Doc NNNN –––– Technical Provisions for Mode S Technical Provisions for Mode S Technical Provisions for Mode S Technical Provisions for Mode S
Services and Extended Squitter Services and Extended Squitter Services and Extended Squitter Services and Extended Squitter
(In production (In production (In production (In production –––– draft version available on the draft version available on the draft version available on the draft version available on the
SCRSP website SCRSP website SCRSP website SCRSP website www.icao.int/anb/panels/scrspwww.icao.int/anb/panels/scrspwww.icao.int/anb/panels/scrspwww.icao.int/anb/panels/scrsp))))
RTCA DO 242A RTCA DO 242A RTCA DO 242A RTCA DO 242A –––– MASPS for ADSMASPS for ADSMASPS for ADSMASPS for ADS----BBBB
RTCA DO 260 RTCA DO 260 RTCA DO 260 RTCA DO 260 –––– MOPS (ES Version 0)MOPS (ES Version 0)MOPS (ES Version 0)MOPS (ES Version 0)
RTCA DO 260 A RTCA DO 260 A RTCA DO 260 A RTCA DO 260 A –––– MOPS (ES Version 1)MOPS (ES Version 1)MOPS (ES Version 1)MOPS (ES Version 1)
* General ADS* General ADS* General ADS* General ADS----B Performance requirementsB Performance requirementsB Performance requirementsB Performance requirements
* * * * SARPsSARPsSARPsSARPs for ES ground stationsfor ES ground stationsfor ES ground stationsfor ES ground stations
* Provisions for merging and sharing of * Provisions for merging and sharing of * Provisions for merging and sharing of * Provisions for merging and sharing of
surveillance data (including ADSsurveillance data (including ADSsurveillance data (including ADSsurveillance data (including ADS----B)B)B)B)
* A roadmap for the evolution of A* A roadmap for the evolution of A* A roadmap for the evolution of A* A roadmap for the evolution of A----G and AG and AG and AG and A----A A A A
surveillancesurveillancesurveillancesurveillance
* A report on other emerging surveillance * A report on other emerging surveillance * A report on other emerging surveillance * A report on other emerging surveillance
techniques (e.g. multilateration)techniques (e.g. multilateration)techniques (e.g. multilateration)techniques (e.g. multilateration)
* A report on 1030/1090 RF Pollution problem* A report on 1030/1090 RF Pollution problem* A report on 1030/1090 RF Pollution problem* A report on 1030/1090 RF Pollution problem
Action by the CNS Sub-group
• To note ADS-B environment requirements
• To include the development service level criteria for ATN services such as ADS-B in its work porogramme
(based on ICAO work and experience gained in some Regions, including AFI Region).
Language:English
Score: 555047.7
-
https://www.icao.int/WACAF/Doc...2007/CNS_SG2/CNSSG2wp15_en.pdf
Data Source: un
VOJISLAV ŠEŠELJ
PUBLIC DOCUMENT
DECISION ON NEW FILING OF PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION OF THE AMICUS CURIAE REPORT
Office of the Prosecutor
Mr Mathias Marcussen
Accused
Vojislav Šešelj
3/55027 BISIT-03-67-T D3 - 1/55027 BIS 03 November 2011 AJ
Case no. IT-03-67-T 28 October 2011
1
TRIAL CHAMBER III (“Chamber”) of the International Tribunal for the
Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International
Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991
(“Tribunal”),
PROPRIO MOTU
NOTING the decision rendered by the Chamber as a public document with an annex
on 26 October 2011 (“Decision of 26 October 2011”),1 in which the Chamber ordered
the filing of the public redacted version of the report by the Amicus Curiae (“Public
Redacted Version of the Report”) appointed to investigate the allegations made by
Vojislav [e{elj (“Accused”) against the Office of the Prosecutor (“Prosecution”),2
CONSIDERING that the Chamber notes that a clerical error appears in the Public
Redacted Version of the Report filed on 26 October 2011,
CONSIDERING, therefore, that the Chamber deems it necessary to amend the status
of the Public Redacted Version of the Report filed on 26 October 2011 so that this
version is no longer accessible to the public and to file, in its place, a new version
enclosed in the annex to the present decision (“New Public Redacted Version of the
Report”),
CONSIDERING that, taking into account this change, the Chamber orders the
Prosecution and the Accused and his associates not to make mention of the Public
Redacted Version of the Report filed on 26 October 2011 and to make sure they
destroy any copies they may have made or transmitted to third parties,
CONSIDERING, also with respect to this change, that the Chamber orders the
parties to file their written submissions on the New Public Redacted Version of the
Report within 15 days of the filing of the present decision for the Prosecution and
within 15 days of receipt of the translation into BCS of this New Public Redacted
Version of the Report for the Accused,
1 “Decision on Filing of Redacted Public Version of Report from the Amicus Curiae Investigating Allegations by the Accused of Witness Intimidation by the Prosecution”, public with public annex, 26 October 2011. 2 See “Redacted Version of the Decision in Reconsideration of the Decision of 15 May 2007 on Vojislav [e{elj’s Motion for Contempt Against Carla Del Ponte, Hildegard Uertz-Rezlaff and Daniel Saxon”, public, 29 June 2010.
2/55027 BIS
Case No. IT-03-67-T 28 October 2011 2
FOR THE FOREGOING REASONS
PURSUANT TO Rule 54 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence,
ORDERS the Registry to change the status of the Public Redacted Version of the
Report filed on 26 October 2011 so that it is confidential and ex parte from the two
parties,
ORDERS the Registry to file as a public document the New Public Redacted Version
of the Report enclosed in the annex to the present Decision,
ORDERS the Prosecution and the Accused and his associates not to make mention of
the Public Redacted Version of the Report filed on 26 October 2011 and to make sure
that they destroy any copies they may have made or transmitted to third parties,
ORDERS the parties to file their written submissions on the New Public Redacted
Version of the Report within 15 days of the filing of the present decision for the
Prosecution and within 15 days of receipt of the translation into BCS of this New
Public Redacted Version of the Report for the Accused,
Done in English and in French, the French version being authoritative.
Language:English
Score: 554671.3
-
https://www.icty.org/x/cases/seselj/tdec/en/111028.pdf
Data Source: un
Sessions
25th Session
Sidebar - Resources
Policymaking Organs
General Conference
Industrial Development Board
Rules of procedure
Reports
Statements
Sessions
50th session
49th session
48th session
Resumed 47th session, 6 September 2019
47th Session
46th Session
Side Event: Advanced Session of the Seventh ISID Forum
Side Event: GMIS Informative Session
45th Session
44th session
43rd session
42nd session
41st session
40th session
39th session
38th session
37th session
36th session
35th Session
Resumed 34th Session
34th Session
33rd Session
32nd Session
31st Session
30th Session
29th Session
28th Session
27th Session
26th Session
25th Session
24th Session
23rd Session
22nd session
21st Session
20th Session
19th Session
Programme and Budget Committee
Meetings and events of the Policymaking Organs
Past Policymaking Organs meetings and events
Constitution
Member States
IGOs/NGOs
Evaluation and Internal Oversight
Procurement
Statistics
Publications
Employment
25th Session
Industrial Development Board, 25th Session
Documents
IDB.25/1 - PROVISIONAL AGENDA (13KB / 1page) - Version française - Version Español
IDB.25/1/Add.1 - Annotated Provisional agenda - Version française - Version Español
IDB.25/2 - Annual Report 2001 - Version française - Version Español
IDB.25/2/Add.1 - Annual Report 2001 - Addendum - List of Technical Cooperation Activities
IDB.25/3 - UNIDO Involvement In Major International Conferences - Version française - Version Español
IDB.25/4 - Investment and Technology Promotion Offices - Version française - Version Español
IDB.25/5 - Joint Inspection Unit Activities Relevant to UNIDO - Version française - Version Español
IDB.25/6 - Financial Situation of UNIDO - Version française - Version Español
IDB.25/7 - Applications from non-governmental organizations for consultative status - Version française - Version Español
IDB.25/8 - Proposed payment plan for Azerbaijan - Version française - Version Español
Report
GC.10/2 - Report of The Industrial Development Board on the Work of its 25th Session - Version française - Version Español
Opening Statement by the Director-General
Address of Director-General Carlos Magariños to the 25th Session of the Industrial Development Board, 15th May, 2002
Footer
Who we are
UNIDO in brief
History
UNIDO Worldwide
Director General
Our focus
UNIDO & the SDGs
Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development
Programme for Country Partnership
Third Industrial Development Decade for Africa
GMIS - Global Manufacturing & Industrialisation Summit
Explore
Projects
Stories
News
Publications
More
Employment
Procurement
Legal Resources
Scam Alert
Evaluation and Internal Oversight
Report Wrongdoing
Contact Information
Press and Media
Disclaimer
© 2017 United Nations Industrial Development Organization
Language:English
Score: 554671.3
-
https://www.unido.org/resource...nt-board/sessions/25th-session
Data Source: un
The report (English version, p. 10; French version, p. 11) indicates that “the Ministry for the Family and the Status of Women was created in June 2002 primarily to complete the process of Algerian women’s emancipation”. (...) The report further states (English version, p. 56; French version, p. 69) that neonatal mortality “currently accounts for 60 per cent of all deaths among children”. (...) Rural women
28. The report (English version, p. 60; French version, p. 74) notes that 41 per cent of women live in rural areas, many of whom are heads of households.
Language:English
Score: 554312.7
-
https://www.un.org/womenwatch/...005-I-CRP1-ADD1(Algeria-E).pdf
Data Source: un
Date Bilateral Agreement
or ICD Upgrade Upgrade
date
Albuquerque-Mazatlán Mexico United States Class I Operational 2005 NAM-ICD Version E
Albuquerque-Monterrey United States Mexico Class I Operational 2005 NAM-ICD Version E
Anchorage-Edmonton United States Canada Class II Operational 0 NAM-ICD Version E
Anchorage-Vancouver United States Canada Class II Operational 0 NAM-ICD Version E
Barranquilla-Kingston Jamaica Colombia Testing
Belize-CENAMER COCESNA Belize N/A Testing 2020 PAC ICD
Belize-Guatemala Guatemala Belize N/A Planned PAC ICD
Belize-Merida Belize Mexico Class I Implementing 2020 NAM-ICD Version D
Bogota-CENAMER COCESNA Colombia N/A Testing 2018 PAC ICD
Boston-Moncton United States Canada Class II Operational 0 NAM-ICD Version E
Boston-Montreal United States Canada Class II Operational 0 NAM-ICD Version E
Boston-Toronto Canada United States Class II Operational 0 NAM-ICD Version E
CENAMER-Costa Rica COCESNA Costa Rica N/A Testing 2020 PAC ICD
CENAMER-El Salvador COCESNA El Salvador N/A Operational October 2015 PAC ICD
CENAMER-Guatemala COCESNA Guatemala N/A Operational December 2015 PAC ICD
CENAMER-Guayaquil COCESNA Ecuador N/A Testing TBD PAC ICD
AIDC/N
AM /ICD/3 – W
P/04 - A2 -
Interface State or Organization Adjacent State or
Organizaition Interface
Class Interface
Status Implem.
(...) Date Bilateral Agreement
or ICD Upgrade Upgrade
date
Mérida-Monterrey Mexico Mexico Class I Operational 2005 LOA
México-Monterrey Mexico Mexico Class I Operational 2005 LOA
Miami-Nassau United States Bahamas N/A Planned TBD NAM-ICD Version E
Miami-Santo Domingo United States Dominican Republic Class I Operational December
2019 NAM-ICD Version E
Minneapolis-Toronto United States Canada Class II Operational 0 NAM-ICD Version E
Minneapolis-Winnipeg United States Canada Class II Operational 0 NAM-ICD Version E
Moncton-New York Canada United States Class II Testing Q4 2019 NAM-ICD Version E
New York-PIARCO Trinidad and Tobago United States N/A Testing 2020 PAC ICD
Nicaragua-San José Nicaragua Costa Rica N/A Planned 2020 PAC ICD
Oakland-Vancouver United States Canada Class II Operational 0 NAM-ICD Version E
Panama-San José Costa Rica Panama N/A Testing 2020 PAC ICD
PIARCO-SAL Trinidad and Tobago Class I Testing 2020 NAM-ICD Version D
PIARCO-San Juan/Miami Trinidad and Tobago United States Class I Testing 2020 NAM-ICD Version D
Port au Prince-Santo Domingo
Dominican Republic Haiti N/A Not planned TBD 0
Salt Lake City-Vancouver Canada United States Class II Operational 0 NAM-ICD Version E
Salt Lake City-Winnipeg United States Canada Class II Operational 0 NAM-ICD Version E
San Juan-Santo Domingo United States Dominican Republic Class I Operational December
2019 NAM-ICD Version E
AIDC/N
AM /ICD/3 – W
P/04 - A5 -
Interface State or Organization Adjacent State or
Organizaition Interface
Class Interface
Status Implem.
Date Bilateral Agreement
or ICD Upgrade Upgrade
date
Seattle-Vancouver United States Canada Class II Operational 0 NAM-ICD Version E
— END —
Language:English
Score: 553953.56
-
https://www.icao.int/NACC/Docu...tings/2020/AIDC/AIDC03WP04.pdf
Data Source: un
Vilmos Kovacs ("the Witness") testified viva voce on 9 and 10 July 2002; that during the examination-in-chief, the expert witness was handed a copy of the Report, which he recognised as being an English translation of his report, and that he was invited by the Prosecution to make any changes he deemed necessary to make this translation more accurate; that the witness proceeded to make these changes; that at the end of the testimony of the witness, the Prosecution provided the Defence, at its request, with a copy of the original Hungarian version of the expert witness’ report; that the Prosecution indicated that it did not seek to rely on this version of the report; that the Chamber then instructed the Defence to submit its observations in relation to the Hungarian version and to indicate, in particular, whether it intended to tender this version of the report into evidence 1 ;
NOTING the "Objection of the Defence on Report of the Expert Witness Dr. (...) Kovacs’ oral testimony be denied, the expert-witness be recalled " to explain the circumstances in which the written report was given", and the Prosecution be heard in relation to the translation discrepancies that existed between both versions; 2
NOTING that on 17 July 2002, the Prosecution indicated in court that, after going through the Objections, it had realised that, by mistake, the Defence had been provided with an earlier rough draft of the expert report in the Hungarian language ("the early Hungarian version"); that it provided the Defence with the final draft of the Hungarian version on that day ("the final Hungarian version"); that the Defence complained that it had received this final version at such a late stage; that the Chamber then instructed the Defence, for the sake of clarity, to submit its complaints in writing; 3
NOTING the "Defence Submissions concerning the Late Production of an Expert Report in Hungarian (Dr. Kovacs)" filed on 18 July 2002 ("the Submissions"), in which the Defence indicated that it had been provided with the final Hungarian version only on 17 July 2002, while the cross-examination of this witness had taken place on an earlier date; that it argued that, while it stood by the Objections, if the Chamber were not to accept them, it would then require more time to translate the final Hungarian version and to compare it with the English version; that the Defence further indicated that the final Hungarian version contained additional pages of conclusions that had not been translated into English; that the Report was dated 18 February 2002, while the final Hungarian version was dated 30 April 2002; that it requested that, for these reasons, the Report be dismissed; 4
NOTING that on 19 July 2002, the Prosecution explained the nature of the problem in closed session and submitted the final drafts of both the English and Hungarian versions of the expert report; 5 that it requested that the Witness be recalled to be subjected to further cross-examination;
CONSIDERING that this final English version contained two additional pages that were not contained in the Report; 6 that the Chamber, after having carefully examined the contents of this final version, decided to accept the recall of the Witness so that the Defence would have the opportunity to cross-examine him on the new pages;
CONSIDERING that on 25 July 2002, the Witness was further examined and cross-examined; that on this occasion, the Prosecution was allowed to further examine the Witness on the "history" of his statement; that the Defence was allowed to put questions to him on "every aspect that was not known to the parties at the conclusion of the previous examination", including the "history" of the statement and the additional pages in the last version of the report;
CONSIDERING that the Defence submits that it is has been disadvantaged by these developments, since it was not granted enough time to prepare for the cross-examination of the Witness on the basis of the new text; that it requested the Chamber for a written decision stating the reasons for re-calling him, since the Prosecution, when filing the final version of the report, did not respect the time-limit established in Rule 94 of the Rules; 7 and that it thus objected to the admission into evidence of Dr.
Language:English
Score: 553396
-
https://www.icty.org/x/cases/galic/tdec/en/11105521.htm
Data Source: un
Space International Frequency Information Circular Databases Online
2002
Please select year to access Space Circular databases in zipped format:
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
The following Space Circular databases are available in zipped format:
SPACE IFIC and WIC DATABASES
DATE
VERSION 3 1
DATABASES 2
VERSION 4 1
DATABASES
VERSION C5 7
DATABASES
VERSION 8
DATABASES
VERSION 9
DATABASES
10.12.2002
2484 3
2484
2484
2484
26.11.2002
2483 4
2483
2483
2483
12.11.2002
2482 5
2482
2482
2482
29.10.2002
2481
2481
2481
2481
15.10.2002
2480
2480
2480
2480
01.10.2002
2479
2479
2479
2479
17.09.2002
2478
2478
2478
2478
03.09.2002
2477
2477
2477
2477
20.08.2002
2476
2476
2476
2476
06.08.2002
2475
2475
2475
2475
23.07.2002
2474
2474
2474
2474
09.07.2002
2473
2473
2473
2473
25.06.2002
2472
2472
2472
2472
11.06.2002
2471
2471
2471
2471
28.05.2002
2470
2470
2470
2470
14.05.2002
2469
2469
2469
2469
30.04.2002
2468
2468
2468
2468
16.04.2002
2467
2467
2467
2467
02.04.2002
2466
2466
2466
2466
19.03.2002
2465 6
2465
2465
2465
05.03.2002
2464
2464
2464
2464
2464
19.02.2002
2463
2463
2463
2463
2463
05.02.2002
2462
2462
2462
2462
2462
22.01.2002
2461
2461
2461
2461
2461
08.01.2002
2460
2460
2460
2460
2460
1 Version 3 refers to MS-ACCESS 7.0 databases to be used with BR Software prior to September 2001 issue of Space Radiocommunication Stations on CD-ROM publication of the Radiocommunication Bureau (BR). Version 4 IFIC databases can only be used with the BR software dated from September 2001.
As from 1 January 2017 all Space IFIC databases are published in the new restructured Space Network System database version 8.0
As from 4 August 2020 all Space IFIC databases are published in the new restructured Space Network System database version 9.0
2 Publication of Version 3 databases will be discontinued after the March 2002 issue of Space Radiocommunication Stations on CD-ROM publication.
3 Modified version of IFIC 2484 database
4 Modified version of IFIC 2483 database
5 Modified version of IFIC 2482 database
6 Modified version of IFIC 2465 database
7 Version C5 is a Converted version of V4 databases.
Language:English
Score: 553201.07
-
https://www.itu.int/sns/wic/demowic02.html
Data Source: un
Ton Liefaard ( English version / Russian version )
6.2. Presentation – Republic of Georgia, Gocha Lordkipanidze ( English version / Russian version )
6.3. (...) Presentation – Montenegro – Ivana Becic ( English version / Russian version )
6.6. Presentation – Belarus – Vera Krugova ( English version / Russian version )
6.7. Presentation – Croatia – Tatjana Katkic Stanic ( English version / Russian version )
6.8. Presentation – Croatia – Vanja Branica ( English version / Russian version )
6.9.
Language:English
Score: 552891.3
-
https://www.unicef.org/eca/child-protection/access-justice
Data Source: un
PKCS7 (X.420:06/1999)
-- Module PKCS7 (X.420:06/1999) -- See also ITU-T X.420 (06/1999) -- See also the index of all ASN.1 assignments needed in this document
-- The ASN.1 in version 1.5 of the PKCS#7 document is not defined in an ASN.1 module. This prevents an IMPORT of it into other ASN.1 modules. -- This Annex contains a module of PKCS#7 ASN.1 definitions conforming to current ASN.1 standards rather than the obsolescent (and now deprecated) 1988/90 version of ASN.1 used in version 1.5 of PKCS#7. -- Extensions to PKCS#7 defined in RFC 2630 are included. -- If differences are found between the ASN.1 in the following module and that in PKCS#7, the latter is definitive. (...) KeyEncryptionKeyRecipientInfo ::= SEQUENCE { version Version , keyEncryptionKeyIdentifier KeyEncryptionKeyIdentifier , keyEncryptionAlgorithm KeyEncryptionAlgorithmIdentifier , encryptedKey EncryptedKey } KeyEncryptionKeyIdentifier ::= SEQUENCE { keyIdentifier OCTET STRING , date GeneralizedTime
OPTIONAL , otherKeyAttribute OtherKeyAttribute
OPTIONAL } EncryptedContentInfo ::= SEQUENCE { contentType PKCS7-CONTENT-TYPE .
Language:English
Score: 552668.6
-
https://www.itu.int/wftp3/Publ...l/itu-t/x/x420/1999/PKCS7.html
Data Source: un
-- Module PKCS7 (X.420:06/1999) -- The ASN.1 in version 1.5 of the PKCS#7 document is not defined in an ASN.1 module. This prevents an IMPORT of it into other ASN.1 modules. -- This Annex contains a module of PKCS#7 ASN.1 definitions conforming to current ASN.1 standards rather than the obsolescent (and now deprecated) 1988/90 version of ASN.1 used in version 1.5 of PKCS#7. -- Extensions to PKCS#7 defined in RFC 2630 are included. -- If differences are found between the ASN.1 in the following module and that in PKCS#7, the latter is definitive. (...) KeyEncryptionKeyRecipientInfo ::= SEQUENCE { version Version, keyEncryptionKeyIdentifier KeyEncryptionKeyIdentifier, keyEncryptionAlgorithm KeyEncryptionAlgorithmIdentifier, encryptedKey EncryptedKey } KeyEncryptionKeyIdentifier ::= SEQUENCE { keyIdentifier OCTET STRING, date GeneralizedTime OPTIONAL, otherKeyAttribute OtherKeyAttribute OPTIONAL } EncryptedContentInfo ::= SEQUENCE { contentType PKCS7-CONTENT-TYPE.
Language:English
Score: 552668.6
-
https://www.itu.int/wftp3/Publ...fl/itu-t/x/x420/1999/PKCS7.asn
Data Source: un
